Is the writing style clear and appropriate to the readership?
Has this been provided? Does it adequately summarize the key findings/approach of the paper?
Reviewers are asked to consider whether the content of a paper is of sufficient interest to justify its length. Each paper should be of the shortest length required to contain all useful and relevant information, and no longer. Should it be shortened and reconsidered in another form?
Is the methodology presented in the manuscript and any analysis provided both accurate and properly conducted?
Does the paper contain the appropriate referencing to provide adequate context for the present work? Are all relevant accompanying data, citations, or references given by the author?
Is the work relevant and novel? Does it contain significant additional material to that already published? Is the research cutting edge or topical?
Does it help to expand or further research in this subject area? The significance and potential impact of a paper is high or low?